wikileaks jakarta cable embassy

Viewing cable 10JAKARTA186, MISSION INDONESIA FUNDING REQUEST TO AMPLIFY SOCIAL MEDIA EFFORT IN TIME FOR MARCH POTUS VISIT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:

• The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
• The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
• The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.

To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10JAKARTA186.

Reference ID	Created	Released	Classification	Origin
10JAKARTA186	2010-02-12 05:05	2011-01-19 11:11	UNCLASSIFIED	Embassy Jakarta

VZCZCXYZ0003
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHJA #0186 0430503
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 120503Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY JAKARTA
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 4468

UNCLAS JAKARTA 000186

SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR R/PPR, IIP/EAP, EAP/PD 
INFO FOR PA, PA/OBS, EAP/MTS, S/P FOR JARED COHEN, IIP FOR DAN SREEBNY 
NSC FOR PRADEEP RAMAMURTHY WHITE HOUSE FOR KATIE LILLIE

E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV KPAO ID XC
SUBJECT: MISSION INDONESIA FUNDING REQUEST TO AMPLIFY SOCIAL MEDIA EFFORT IN TIME

FOR MARCH POTUS VISIT

REF: Jakarta 0065

¶1. Action/funding request in paragraph 5. 2. Summary: Mission Indonesia requests 

immediate additional funding to use new media and social networking tools maximize

online outreach for the POTUS visit scheduled for late March, 2010. Already the 

leading U.S. Mission in the world on Facebook with nearly 50,000 “fans,” and one 

of the leading Missions using Twitter, YouTube and engaging local bloggers to 

promote USG messages and information, we are uniquely positioned to use these 

tools to amplify key topics and themes to support the upcoming visit by President 

Obama. We request $100,000 in funding from R to boost our Facebook fan page 

membership to 1 million, and can accomplish this in 30 days. End Summary. 

Proven PD 2.0 Expertise

¶3. U.S. Mission Indonesia is on the forefront of Public Diplomacy 2.0. With over 

50,000 fans the most of any diplomatic mission worldwide, are gaining traction 

using social media in Indonesia for PD. Our efforts were recently cited in an 

article on CNET Asia, as “a great example of social media interaction in Indonesia,

” prompting the author to wonder “how long will it take for other organizations 

and businesses to do the same?” We also have our own YouTube channel with over 300 

videos, almost 1,000 followers on Twitter, and -- for the last two years -- engaged

positively with thousands of country’s most influential bloggers.

Indonesia’s New Media Environment

¶4. Indonesia’s internet community is emerging, but recently has become a powerful

political force for reform (reftel). With roughly 10% of the population able to 

access the internet at least monthly, this represents over 25 million people,

nearly half of whom are on Facebook. In the seventh-largest and one of the 

fastest-growing Facebook markets in the world, we will directly reach a young, 

urban population which does not rely on traditional media as information sources. 

In addition, Indonesians’ special connection to the 44th President means that 

interest in the visit is incredibly high. Our Facebook post announcing the visit 

had interactions and comments from over 1,000 people in less than two weeks, 

and stories about the visit appeared in the media every day since the official 

announcement.

¶5. By actively connecting the POTUS visit to our new media efforts, we have a 

unique chance to build a sustainable online platform to engage Indonesians on

USG issues and messages long after the visit. With enough funding to properly 

amplify and build on past our successes, Mission Indonesia requests $100,000 

immediately in order reach a goal of 1 million Facebook fans in just 30 days --

just before POTUS visit.

Action Plan and Implementation

¶6. This money would be used in three areas. First, it would increase direct 

advertising via Facebook. Currently, Embassy Jakarta spends less than $25 per day 

on advertising, and nets between 300-400 new fans daily. Increasing this tenfold

over 30 days, results in a gain of 100,000 to 120,000 fans. The funds would also

be used to promote the visit and our fan page as the place to learn more by 

extensively advertising on Indonesian online portals, banner ads, YouTube, 

Twitter, and other promotional efforts, including embedding bloggers, contests 

and giveaways, and using SMS technology. With over 100 million mobile phone 

users in Indonesia, texting is a powerful way to include a huge audience. 

Partnering with a major telecom provider, we can encourage Indonesians to 

sign up for real-time updates via their cell phone -- a great way to reach 

those not yet online about the visit. Cost: $60,000.

¶7. Another key promotion strategy to generate interest will be offering a “golden 

ticket” via Facebook. We propose making a dream come true for one lucky Indonesian,

by providing an opportunity to meet POTUS during his visit. If the White House 

approves, we could invite fans to post why they should meet President Obama, and 

in doing so, use our social media platform to connect fans to the visit, as well 

as build excitement beforehand and follow-up coverage afterwards. In addition, 

we could partner with a local TV station to have a “finalist” show and increase 

coverage. RSO would ensure any winner(s) are vetted for security issues. If the 

White House would not agree to this, an alternate “dream prize” might be an 

educational trip to the U.S. Cost: $15,000.

¶8. Third, in order to implement these ideas in this limited time-frame, 

we need short-term expert help on this promotion in the form of a qualified 

local digital marketing agency, who could assist the Embassy’s new media team 

(currently one officer and three FSNs working on it part-time). Cost: $25,000.

OSIUS

what the same :) 

Read More

Sourceforge Attack: Full Report

Sourceforge Attack: Full Report

Posted on Saturday, January 29th, 2011 by admin
Category: General

As we’ve previously announced, SourceForge.net has been the target of a directed attack. We have completed the first round of analysis, and have a much more solid picture of what happened, the extent of the impact, our plan to reduce future risk of attack. We’re still working hard on fixing things, but we wanted to share what we know with the community.
We discovered the attack on Wednesday, and have been working hard to get things back in order since then. While several boxes were compromised we believe we caught things before the attack escalated beyond its first stages.
Our early assessment of which services and hosts were impacted, and the choice to disable CVS, ishell, file uploads, and project web updates appears to have prevented any further escalation of the attack or any data corruption activities.
We expect to continue work on validating data through the weekend, and begin restoring services early next week. There is a lot of data to be validated and these tests will take some time to run.  We’ll provide more timeline information as we have more information.
We recognize that we could get services back online faster if we cut corners on data validtion. We know downtime causes serious inconveniences for some of you. But given the negative consequences of corrupted data, we feel it’s vital to take the time to validate everything that could potentially have been touched.

Attack Description

The general course of the attack was pretty standard. There was a root privilege escalation on one of our platforms which permitted exposure of credentials that were then used to access machines with externally-facing SSH. Our network partitioning prevented escalation to other zones of our network.
This is the point where we found the attack, locked down servers, and began work on analysis and response.

Immediate Response

Our first action response included many of the standard steps:
* analysis of the attack and log files on the compromised servers
* methodically checking all other services and servers for exploits
* further network lockdown and updating of server credentials

Service shutdown

Once we knew the attack was present, we locked down the impacted hosts, so that we could reduce the risk of escalation, from those servers to other hosts, and prevent possible data gathering activities.
This strategy resulted in service downtime for:
* CVS Hosting
* ViewVC
* New Release upload capability
* ProjectWeb/shell

Password invalidation

Our analysis uncovered (among other things) a hacked SSH daemon, which was modified to do password capture. We don’t have reason to the attacker was successful in collecting passwords. But, the presence of this daemon and server level access to one-way hashed, and encrypted, password data led us to take the precautionary measure of invalidating all SourceForge user account passwords. Users have been asked to recover account access by email.

Data Validation

It’s better to be safe than sorry, so we’ve decided to perform a comprehensive validation of project data from file releases, to SCM commits. We will compare data agains pre-attack backups, and will identify changed and added. We will review that data, and will will also refer anything suspicious to individual project teams for further assessment as needed.
The validation work is a precaution, because while we don’t have evidence of any data tampering, we’d much prefer to burn a bunch of CPU cycles verifying everything than to discover later that some extra special trickery lead to some undetected badness.

Service Restoration

Now that most of the analysis is done, we’ve started the next stage of our efforts, which includes the obvious work of restoring compromised boxes from bare metal, and implementing a number of new controls to reduce likelihood of future attack.
We will of course also be updating the credentials which reside on these hosts and performed quite a few steps to further lock down access to these machines.
We are in process of bringing services back one by one, as data validation is completed, and we get the newly configured hosts online. We expect that data validation will progress through the weekend, and we’ll really start getting swinging on service restoration early next week.

File Release Services

Many folks have suggested that the most likely motivation for an attack against sourceforge would be to corrupt project releases.
We’ve found no evidence of this, but are taking extrodinary care to make sure that we don’t somehow distribute corrupted release files.
We are performing validation of data against stored hashes, backups, and additional data copies.
We expect to restore these services first, as soon as data validation is completed.

Project Web

One attack vector that impacts our services directly is the shared project web space. So, let’s talk about that in a bit more detail.
Sourceforge.net has been around a long time, and security decisions made a decade ago are now being reassessed. In most cases past decisions were made around the general principle that we trust open source developers to work together, play nice, and generally do the right thing. Services were rolled out based on widespread trust for the developer community. And that philosophy served us well.
But in the years since then, we’ve evolved from hundreds of sf.net users to millions, and in many cases it’s time to re-asses the balance between widespread trust and security. Project Web is a prime example of this, and we’ve been working at a deliberate pace to isolate project web space, and have begun rolling out the new “secure project web” service to many of our projects.
This new secure project web includes a new security model that moves us away from shared hosting while preserving the scalability we need for mass hosting.
Because of this attack we’ll be accelerating the rollout of Secure Project Web services as part of the process of bringing the project web service back online. This will allow us to provide both improved functionality, and better secruity.

CVS

CVS service is one of SourceForge.net’s oldest services and, due to limitations in CVS itself, cannot readily live on our scalable network storage solution. Validation of this data is going to require several days and we anticipate that this service will be restored sometime in the later part of week.
We are also considering the end-of-life of the CVS service and hope to have user support in migrating CVS users to Subversion in coming months. Subversion generally provides parity to CVS commands, and many of our users have made this transition successfully in the past.
From SVN, projects can move to Git if desired.

Looking forward

We are very much committed to the ongoing process of improving our security, and we will continue making behind the scenes improvements to our infrastructure on a regular basis. This isn’t a one time event, it’s a process, and we’re going to stay fully engaged over the long term.
I’d like to end with a more personal note, I’ve been working with our Ops team a lot this week, and I think we can all say that the patience and support that we’ve received from the community has been the best part of a very bad week.
Thanks again for all the support and encouragement.

Read More

30 Black Hat SEO Techniques

30 Black Hat SEO Techniques 
Wicked by xlorddashx.
Black hat SEO is both a myth and a reality we have to face sooner or later as SEO practicioners. While I abide by probably one of the strictest SEO codes of ethics around and SEOptimise is a clean white hat SEO company company itself we still can’t deny that there is black hat SEO.

The sheer existence of black hat SEO techniques must be acknowledged for several reasons.

As Rishi Lakhani noted on his new SEO blog: You need it at least to know what to avoid or to know how competitors who perform worse than you still manage to outrank your site.

The good news is: Most black hat SEO techniques can be used in a clean, ethical white hat way as well.

They are like knives: You can slice bread with a knife but you can kill with it as well. It’s your decision how you use the knife. Also consider the problem with overall perception of the SEO industry. Your hat can be whiter than snow and still people will treat you as the guy with the virtual knife.

Personally I think black hat SEO is for the weak.

The black hat logic goes: When you can’t win the game you have to cheat. It’s the same dilemma as in sports though: When everybody cheats how are you going to win? That’s why reputable and successful SEO experts don’t have to use it.
OK, long story short, here are the 30 black hat techniques you can use ethically as well. Take note how I am explaining only the positive way of using each technique. I do not advocate the use of it in it’s original black hat context. Use these knives as kitchen knives:

black hat by googlisti

http://crazyflx.com/dap/a/?a=79&p=www.crazyflx.com/softwarebots/ultimate-google-suggest-scraper-over-300-to-have-made-yours-for-24-99/

1. Hidden text – Create modern CSS based websites with JQuery effects. They often hide large portions of text in layers to display them on click or mouse over for usability reasons. Example: CSS pagination.
2. IP delivery – Offer the proper localized content to those coming from a country specific IP address. Offer the user a choice though. Shopping.com does a great job here.
3. 301 redirects – Redirect outdated pages to the newer versions or your homepage. When moving to a new domain use them of course as well.
4. Throw Away Domains – Create exact match micro sites for short term popular keywords and abandon them when the trend subsides. Something like tigerwoodssexrehab.com
5. Cloaking – Hide the heavy Flash animations from Google, show the text-only version optimized for accessibility and findability.
6. Paid links – Donate for charity, software developers etc. Many of them display links to those who donate.
7. Keyword stuffing – Tags and folksonomy. Keyword stuff but adding several tags or let your users do the dirty work via UGC tagging (folksonomy) every major social site does that.
8. Automatically generated keyword pages – Some shopping search engines create pages from each Google search query and assign the appropriate products to each query. You can do that as well if you have enough content.
9. Mispsellings – Define, correct the misspelled term and/or redirect to the correct version.
10. Scraping – Create mirrors for popular sites. Offer them to the respective webmasters. Most will be glad to pay less.
11. Ad only pages – Create all page ads (interstitials) and show them before users see content like many old media do.
12. Blog spam – Don’t spam yourself! Get spammed! Install a WordPress blog without Akismet spam protection. Then create a few posts about Mesothelioma for example, a very profitable keyword. Then let spammers comment spam it or even add posts (via TDO Mini Forms). Last but not least parse the comments for your keyword and outgoing links. If they contain the keyword publish them and remove the outgoing links of course. Bot user generated content so to say.
13. Duplicate content on multiple domains – Offer your content under a creative Commons License with attribution.
14. Domain grabbing – Buy old authority domains that failed and revive them instead of putting them on sale.
15. Fake news – Create real news on official looking sites for real events. You can even do it in print. Works great for all kinds of activism related topics.
16. Link farm – Create a legit blog network of flagship blogs. A full time pro blogger can manage 3 to 5 high quality blogs by her or himself.
17. New exploits – Find them and report them, blog about them. You break story and thus you get all the attention and links. Dave Naylor is excellent at it.
18. Brand jacking – Write a bad review for a brand that has disappointed you or destroys the planet or set up a brand x sucks page and let consumers voice their concerns.
19. Rogue bots – Spider websites and make their webmasters aware of broken links and other issues. Some people may be thankful enough to link to you.
20. Hidden affiliate links – In fact hiding affiliate links is good for usability and can be even more ethical than showing them. example.com/ref?id=87233683 is far worse than than just example.com. Also unsuspecting Web users will copy your ad to forums etc. which might break their TOS. The only thing you have to do is disclose the affiliate as such. I prefer to use [ad] (on Twitter for example) or [partner-link] elsewhere. This way you can strip the annoying “ref” ids and achieve full disclosure at the same time.
21. Doorway pages – Effectively doorway pages could also be called landing pages. The only difference is that doorway pages are worthless crap while landing pages are streamlined to suffice on their own. Common for both is that they are highly optimized for organic search traffic. So instead of making your doorway pages just a place to get skipped optimize them as landing pages and make the users convert right there.
22. Multiple subdomains – Multiple subdomains for one domain can serve an ethical purpose. Just think blogspot.co or wordpress.com – they create multiple subdomains by UGC. This way they can rank several times for a query. You can offer subdomains to your users as well.
23. Twitter automation – There is nothing wrong with Twitter automation as long as you don’t overdo it. Scheduling and repeating tweets, even automatically tweeting RSS feeds from your or other blogs is perfectly OK as long as the Twitter account has a real person attending it who tweets “manually” as well. Bot accounts can be ethical as well in case they are useful no only for yourself. A bot collecting news about Haiti in the aftermath of the earthquake would be perfectly legit if you ask me.
24. Deceptive headlines – Tabloids use them all the time, black hat SEO also do. There are ethical use cases for deceptive headlines though. Satire is one of course and humor simply as well. For instance I could end this list with 24 items and declare this post to a list of 30 items anyways. That would be a good laugh. I’ve done that in the past but in a more humorous post.
25. Google Bowling – The bad thing about Google bowling is that you hurt sites you don’t like. You could reverse that: Reverse Google bowling would mean that you push sites of competitors you like to make those you dislike disappear below. In a way we do that all the time linking out to the competition, the good guys of SEO who then outrank the ugly sites we like a lot less.
26. Invisible links – You’d never used invisible links on your sites did you? You liar! You have. Most free web counters and statistic tools use them. Statcounter is a good example. So when you embed them on your site you use invisible links.
27. Different content for search engines than users – Do you use WordPress? Then you have the nofollow attribute added to your comment links. this way the search engine gets different content than the user. He sees and clicks a link. A search bot sees a no trespass sign instead. In white hat SEO it’s often called PageRank sculpting. Most social media add ons do that by default.
28. Hacking sites – While crackers hack sites security experts warn site owners that they vulnerabilities. Both discover the same issues. Recently I got an email by someone who warned me to update my WordPress installation. That was a grand idea I thought.
29. Slander linkbait – Pulling a Calacanis like “SEO is bullshit” is quite common these days. Why don’t do it the other way around? The anti SEO thing doesn’t work that good anymore unless you are as famous as Robert Scoble. In contrast a post dealing with “100 Reasons to Love SEO Experts” might strike a chord by now.
30. Map spam – Instead of faking multiple addresses all over the place just to appear on Google Maps and Local why don’t you simply create an affiliate network of real life small business owners with shops and offices who, for a small amount of money, are your representatives there? All they need to do is to collect your mail from Google and potential clients.

Read More

Indoleaks.org Is Up Againt

Maybe in rusia have Rospil.info and Openleaks.org will be launch soon but in indonesia has ben launch indoleaks.org. although in the initial publication of his experiencing problems but end up again.But over the air indoleaks.org overage occurs fear from certain parties, who think this is a taboo and a secret has been hidden for many  years, although a little small talk can be a refresher for the history of this submarine off the mark away and directed her to a particular doctrine or other terms can be mass duping duping public.Indoleaks.org already uploaded some files that they got to the site, and amazing to many who download until this article was written is 400 thousands.Wikileaks and indoleaks have deferent mangement and strategy.Wikileaks with julian asssange able to appear publicly and became a fugitive Interpol.And wikileaks release the document step by step you know why ? the answer is WikiLeaks sure if they are accurate and correct document.How about indoleaks oke i will explain.Indoleaks we never know who is behind this site,well they never show in public hahhaha ,and now about the document.Indoleaks release all document in the same time looklikes afraid running out off time before goverment block their site (i think).This is a little profile about indoleaks:

About UsIndoleaks emerged as an answer to the deadlock information.
Especially the information likely to be a boomerang for the authorities, politicians and other evil people in Indonesia. Indoleaks trying to pick and choose which documents should be publicly known, collections of hundreds Indoleaks. We will continue to break the deadlock information, with our right to publish the name of the information.
For us, the silence of the oppressed, more despicable than the oppressors themselves.Let us speak out. Break the deadlock information.All documents in Indoleaks, we present a verbatim. What is.And, of course, still original from the first hand.

    You can also share with us, with contact through indoleaks@gmail.com
Terms and ConditionsIndoleaks.org have some terms and conditions associated with documents in it. Namely:

    * Documents must be original, with no opinion of the sender in it.
    * Indoleaks.org will mention the source document is ANONYMOUS.
    * Document published a document that HAVE the public interest.
    * Indoleaks.org NOT going to publish information relating to bank accounts, medical records, and other personal secret.
    * Indoleaks.org NOT responsible for the use of the published document. 

   Until  now indonesian goverment not take further action.How long  indoleaks able to survive?
astray greetings/salam sesat. 

Read More

Add spell check to Nano

 Nano is simple to use, efficient, and extensible. Nano can be used for many things: Writing, programming, editing configuration files, and more. Depending upon your needs, you might need to check the spelling of what you are writing or editing within Nano. Let’s take a look at how you can add spell checking to this handy editor.

Out of the box, one thing that Nano is missing is spell checking. Nano does include the option for spell checking (you can even invoke spell checking from within Nano, but it won’t work). Why is this? Simple – Nano makes use of a specific spell checker that is not installed on most distributions by default. So even though Nano has the keyboard shortcut available for spell checking, you have to make it work. Let’s see how.
Installing the spell checker
Nano depends upon the package spell for spell checking. This is simple to install, from the command line, if you follow these steps:

1. Open up a terminal window.
2. Issue the command sudo apt-get install spell.
3. Type your sudo password and hit Enter.
4. Accept any dependencies (if necessary).
5. Let the installation complete.

Once complete you are ready to use spell checking.
Check your spelling

Figure 1

Open up a document for editing within Nano. When you do this you should see the list of keyboard shortcuts along the bottom of the screen. Of those shortcuts the ^T shortcut should be listed. That will invoke spell checking.
With your document open hit Ctrl-t to begin the check. Figure 1 shows the Nano spell checking in action. Spell will begin at the top of your document and continue on until it comes across a word it does not recognize. When it lands on a mis-spelled (or unrecognizable) word it will stop and ask you to correct the spelling of the misspelled word. Spell will not offer suggestions for replacements. Instead Spell will simply allow you to edit the misspelled word. Once you’ve edited the word you will have the chance to change all instances of the misspelled word. To replace a single instance just retype the word and hit enter. You will be asked if you want to replace that instance. If you want to only replace that instance hit Y (for yes) or, if you want to replace all instances hit A (for all) and all instances of the misspelled word will be replaced. If you have misspelled your correction just hit Ctrl-c to cancel the replacement.
Once Nano is finished with the spell checking it will inform you by saying so. Since there is nothing automated or fancy about Nano you will need to remember to save your changes made to your document when you exit (using Ctrl-x) the editor.
Final thoughts
Most users have grown accustomed to auto-spell checks that make spelling suggestions to the users. That’s not Nano. Nano wants you to think for yourself. It’s not perfect, but it’s as close to spell check as you will find with Nano.

Read More

*The CIA honeypot Wikileaks mirror * nice dam shit

Yesterday, I posted an item referencing a reddit thread and a widely-retweeted Google search string referencing a purported "CIA wikileaks mirror honeypot" that revealed itself as likely having been set up by the CIA. It wasn't. It was some guy's joke or something.
I'm traveling with wonky mobile internet, and in the process of attempting to update the post with a clarification late last night in a sleep-depped state, I screwed up. The post was deleted. There is no conspiracy here, and no reason to believe the CIA is setting up fake Wikileaks mirrors (though, not a bad idea, amirite?).
However, I can tell you this, no joke: I'm traveling in Texas, in an area with a high Muslim population. Last night, I saw ads on the hotel TV for the CIA. Clandestine services recruitment ads. I googled around, and apparently these are part of a broad campaign that began in 2009, to recruit more Arab-Americans. I can't find the actual ad I saw last night, but here are earlier examples from the same campaign. You may also want to fire up Tor, disable cookies, and take their personality quiz.
No, neither of those have anything to do with a misleading Reddit thread, or me screwing up a blog post. But! The TV ads were so bad (even the aspect ratio was messed up), I thought, yeah, I could believe.
byXeni Jardin

So dont visit this mirror http://wikileaks.psytek.net/ maybe is some trap from CIA hehehheh  or CIA trying doing something survey to find target and then shut down their enemy. and i try to trace their domain and server an this the result :
 13   253 ms   222 ms   228 ms  ge-11-2-0.mpr2.pao1.us.above.net [64.125.12.205]

 14   244 ms   231 ms   284 ms  xe-2-2-0.cr2.sjc2.us.above.net [64.125.31.70]
 15   236 ms   240 ms   262 ms  xe-0-0-0.cr1.sjc2.us.above.net [64.125.30.125]
 16   243 ms   237 ms   238 ms  xe-2-1-0.cr1.lax112.us.above.net [64.125.24.17]

 17   315 ms   317 ms   315 ms  xe-3-2-0.cr1.iah1.us.above.net [64.125.26.121]
 18   329 ms   318 ms   342 ms  xe-2-1-0.cr1.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.30.58]
 19   365 ms   317 ms   337 ms  xe-1-1-0.er1.dfw2.us.above.net [64.125.26.210]
 20   321 ms   307 ms   307 ms  main1.above.net [209.133.126.42]
 21   362 ms   498 ms   336 ms  vlan907.core7.dfw1.rackspace.net [98.129.84.181]

 22   355 ms   347 ms   319 ms  aggr510a-2-core7.dfw1.rackspace.net [98.129.84.8
7]
 23   347 ms   350 ms   348 ms  psytek.net [173.203.241.80]

Psytek.net - Psytek Whois Information

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.


The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.domain: psytek.net[Who Is Domain]
owner: Brad -
email: [FIND OUT MORE ABOUT THIS EMAIL ADDRESS][Who Is Domain]
address: GPO BOX 3356
city: Melbourne
state: Victoria
postal-code: 3000
country: AU
phone: +613.98541544
admin-c: CNET-466771 [FIND OUT MORE ABOUT THIS EMAIL ADDRESS][Who Is Domain]
tech-c: CNET-466771 [FIND OUT MORE ABOUT THIS EMAIL ADDRESS][Who Is Domain]
billing-c: CNET-466771 [FIND OUT MORE ABOUT THIS EMAIL ADDRESS][Who Is Domain]
nserver: a.ns.joker.com[Who Is Domain]
nserver: b.ns.joker.com[Who Is Domain]
nserver: c.ns.joker.com[Who Is Domain]
status: lock
created: 2004-05-22 21:21:40 UTC
modified: 2009-09-04 13:20:41 UTC
expires: 2012-05-22 21:21:25 UTC

contact-hdl: CNET-466771
person: Brad -
email: [FIND OUT MORE ABOUT THIS EMAIL ADDRESS][Who Is Domain]
address: GPO BOX 3356
city: Melbourne
state: Victoria
postal-code: 3000
country: AU
phone: +613.98541544

source: joker.com[Who Is Domain] live whois service
query-time: 0.007335
db-updated: 2010-12-11 01:36:50
NOTE: By submitting a WHOIS query, you agree to abide by the following
NOTE: terms of use: You agree that you may use this data only for lawful
NOTE: purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this data to:
NOTE: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
NOTE: unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via direct mail,
NOTE: e-mail, telephone, or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated,
NOTE: electronic processes that apply to Joker.com[Who Is Domain] (or its computer systems).
NOTE: The compilation, repackaging, dissemination or other use of this data
NOTE: is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Joker.com[Who Is Domain].

Is psytek on dedicated hosting? Check it out - Click here.

Psytek.net - Psytek

Psytek IP:

173.203.241.80

Psytek server location:

San Antonio in United States

Psytek ISP:

Rackspace Hosting

Email Trace

Who owns an email address?

WHO IS? What does that mean?

Everyone who registers a domain name has his personal contact information in a WHO IS database.

Our WHO IS database lets you search for the WHO IS of any Domain.
The WHO IS Entry in the WHO IS database normally includes the name, address, phone number, email address and domain name expiration date of the domain owner.
That means that anyone who lookups an WHO IS entry will find the contact information of the owner. Some domain registrars offer private domain registrations. In this case the WHO IS contact information of the registrar is shown and not the private Informations of the domain owner. Test our WHO IS lookup tool and see how it works.

psytek.net Traffic Statistics

Psytek Alexa Traffic Rank: 804,391

Email Trace

Who owns an email address?

psytek.net Server Location

Full-screen

psytek.net server location:
San Antonio in United States

psytek.net IP address: 173.203.241.80

and everything is change and the website have the screenshot was be down congrat CIA
so what do you think ?

Read More